- -

Platforms of knowledge: architectural heritage practice and the information age in South Africa

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Platforms of knowledge: architectural heritage practice and the information age in South Africa

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Barker;Swart - ...
Tamaño: 891.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Barker, Arthur es_ES
dc.contributor.author Swart, Johan es_ES
dc.coverage.spatial east=22.937506; north=-30.559482; name=Sud-àfrica es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-04T13:59:54Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-04T13:59:54Z
dc.date.issued 2020-01-28
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/138332
dc.description.abstract [EN] The intellectual basis for preservation and conservation is formed by the study, record and dissemination of the works of humanity. Due to the negative impacts of exponential city growth, through densification and the impact of climate change, more considered design approaches need to be made for the reuse and adaptation of buildings in historical contexts. The fast pace of project design, and implementation, in the 21st century, has fostered the need for directly accessible architectural heritage knowledge. Therefore, architectural heritage practice demands access to curated information to ensure considered, and appropriate, design responses. This is important, not only for heritage and other related practitioners, but also for researchers and students. The advent of the Information Age initiated new methodologies for archiving knowledge. These developments provided architectural heritage practice with extended platforms of knowledge, either born-digital or founded on analogue princip es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] La base intelectual para la preservación y la conservación está formada por el estudio, el registro y la difusión de las obras de la humanidad. Debido a los impactos negativos del crecimiento exponencial de la ciudad, a través de la densificación y el impacto del cambio climático, se necesitan enfoques de diseño que consideren más la reutilización yla  adaptación de los edificios en contextos históricos. El rápido ritmo de diseño y ejecución de los proyectos en el siglo XXI ha fomentado la necesidad de contar directamente con conocimientos accesibles sobre el patrimonio arquitectónico. Por lo tanto, la práctica del patrimonio arquitectónico exige el acceso a información comisariada para asegurar respuestas de diseño consideradas y apropiadas. Esto es importante, no sólo para los profesionales del patrimonio y otros profesionales relacionados, sino también para los investigadores y estudiantes. El advenimiento de la Era de la Información inició nuevas metodologías para archivar el conoc es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Virtual Archaeology Review es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Architectural heritage practice es_ES
dc.subject Heritage assessment practitioner es_ES
dc.subject Digital architectural heritage es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge platforms es_ES
dc.subject Evaluación práctica del patrimonio arquitectónico es_ES
dc.subject Profesional en evaluación del patrimonio es_ES
dc.subject Plataformas de datos digitales es_ES
dc.subject Patrimonio arquitectónico es_ES
dc.title Platforms of knowledge: architectural heritage practice and the information age in South Africa es_ES
dc.title.alternative Las plataformas de conocimiento: la evaluación práctica del patrimonio arquitectónico y la era de la información en Sudáfrica es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/var.2020.12234
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Barker, A.; Swart, J. (2020). Platforms of knowledge: architectural heritage practice and the information age in South Africa. Virtual Archaeology Review. 11(22):56-73. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.12234 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.12234 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 56 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 73 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 11 es_ES
dc.description.issue 22 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9947
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\12234 es_ES
dc.description.references Association of Professional Heritage Practitioners (APHP). 2011. Code of Conduct for Heritage Assessment Practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.aphp.org.za/aphp-code-conduct es_ES
dc.description.references Armstrong, A. R. E. (2006). Architectural Archives/Archiving Architecture: The Digital ERA. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 25(2), 12-17. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27949434 - https://doi.org/10.1086/adx.25.2.27949434 es_ES
dc.description.references Australia ICOMOS. (2000). The Burra Charter: the Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance: with associated guidelines and code on the ethics of co-existence. Burwood, Vic.: Australia ICOMOS. https://www.icomos.org/australia es_ES
dc.description.references Ball, J. (2017). Joburg gets a new online heritage system!. Available from: http://www.theheritageportal.co.za/article/joburg-gets-new-online-heritage-system es_ES
dc.description.references Barker, A., Swart, J. & Van Niekerk, K. (2016). The importance of Architectural Archives. Architecture South Africa, 79, 6-9. es_ES
dc.description.references Brusaporci, S. (2017). Digital Innovations in Architectural Heritage Conservation: Emerging Research and Opportunities (pp. 1-152). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2434-2 es_ES
dc.description.references City of Cape Town. (2019). Environment and heritage education resources. www.capetown.gov.za/Family%20and%20home/education-and-research-materials/graphics-and-educational-material/environment-and-heritage-education-resources. es_ES
dc.description.references Department of Arts and Culture. (2010). National policy on the digitisation of heritage resources (draft). South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.archivalplatform.org/images/resources/NATIONAL_POLICY_ON_DIGITISATION_V8.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA). (2016). Cultural heritage survey guidelines and assessment tools for protected areas in South Africa. South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/ legislations/culturalheritagesurveyguidelines_protectedareas2016_0.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Department of Environment and Heritage Protection. (2013). Assessing cultural heritage significance. Using the cultural heritage criteria. Queensland, Australia. Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0030/ 66693/using-the-criteria.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references De Vletter, M. (2019). Don't Be Afraid of the Digital. Arts, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010006 es_ES
dc.description.references Esperdy, G. (2013). Building Data: Field Notes on the Future of the Past. Places Journal, September. https://doi.org/10.22269/130923 es_ES
dc.description.references Evans, J. & Wilson, Z. (2018). Inclusive repositories and recordkeeping: towards a manifesto. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(8), 857-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1428671 es_ES
dc.description.references Hawes, S. E. (2010). Curating Architecture: An Investigation of the Motives and Practice of Architectural Collection and Exhibition with Recommendations for Interpretation of the Architectural Study Collection at Independence National Historical Park. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/141/ es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, X., Ng, J., & Xia, S. (2018). User-Centered Evaluation of Metadata Schema for Nonmovable Cultural Heritage: Murals and Stone Cave Temples. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(12), 1476-1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24065 es_ES
dc.description.references Kleinman, K. (2002). Archiving/Architecture. Archival Science 1: 321-332, 2001. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://www.nyu.edu/classes/bkg/methods/kleinman.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438900 es_ES
dc.description.references Kleyn, L. (2018). Open access research publications and South African Institutional Repositories (IRs) in the context of intellectual property law and practices: and interdisciplinary study. Unpublished M(Phil) (Law) Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa. es_ES
dc.description.references Kotze, P. (1998). In memory of Sophia Gray: Store houses of knowledge. S.A. Architect, Sept/Oct, 43-47. es_ES
dc.description.references Liebetrau, P. (Ed). (2010). Managing Digital Collections: A Collaborative Initiative on the South African Framework. National Research Foundation. https://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/5/51/Managing_Digital_Collections.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references National Archives and Records Service of South Africa (NARSSA). (2013). Digitisation Strategy. Retrieved from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.za/sites/default/files/National%20Archives%20Digitisation%20Strategy%20-%20approved%20November%202013.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references National Heritage Resource Act 25 of 1999 (South Africa) (NHRA). Retrieved from http://www.dac.gov.za/sites/ default/files/Legislations%20Files/a25-99.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Phiri, L. & Suleman, H. (2013). Managing cultural heritage: information systems architecture. http://pubs.cs.uct.ac.za/archive/00001008/01/phiri_iresearch2013_architecture.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Pickover, M. (2014). Patrimony, Power and Politics: Selecting, Constructing and Preserving Digital Heritage Content in South Africa and Africa. http://library.ifla.org/1023/1/138-pickover-en.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Pierce, K. (2011). Collaborative Efforts to Preserve Born-Digital Architectural Records: A Case Study. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Fall 2011), 43-48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41244064 - https://doi.org/10.1086/adx.30.2.41244064 es_ES
dc.description.references Redweik, P., Cláudio, A., Carmo, M., Naranjo, J. & Sanjosé, J. (2017). Digital preservation of cultural and scientific heritage: involving university students to raise awareness of its importance. Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(16): 22-34. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.4629 es_ES
dc.description.references Ruiz Gil, J.-A. (2017). Digital heritage training for historians in Europe: a local proposal. Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(17), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.4726 es_ES
dc.description.references Smuts, K., Mlungwana, N., & Wiltshire, N. G. (2016). SAHRIS: South Africa's integrated, web-based heritage management system. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-01-2016-0002 es_ES
dc.description.references Waters, D. & Garrett, J. (1996). Preserving Digital Information. Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. Washington, DC: The Commission on Preservation and Access and Research Libraries Group. https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub63/ es_ES
dc.description.references Willis, A. (1996). The Place of Repositories in the Universe of Architectural Documentation. American Archivist. Vol. 59, Spring. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.59.2.l54510w443504578 - https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.59.2.l54510w443504578 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem