A Game-Theory method to design job rotation schedules to prevent musculoskeletal disorders Based on workers preferences and competencies

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author	Asensio-Cuesta, Sabina	es_ES
dc.contributor.author	Garcia-Gomez, Juan M	es_ES
dc.contributor.author	Poza-Lujan, Jose-Luis	es_ES
dc.contributor.author	Conejero, J. Alberto	es_ES
dc.date.accessioned	2020-12-23T04:31:51Z
dc.date.available	2020-12-23T04:31:51Z
dc.date.issued	2019-12	es_ES
dc.identifier.issn	1660-4601	es_ES
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10251/157768
dc.description.abstract	[EN] Job rotation is an organizational strategy based on the systematic exchange of workers between jobs in a planned manner according to specific criteria. This study presents the GS-Rot method, a method based on Game Theory, in order to design job rotation schedules by considering not only workers' job preferences, but also the competencies required for different jobs. With this approach, we promote workers' active participation in the design of the rotation plan. It also let us deal with restrictions in assigning workers to job positions according to their disabilities (temporal or permanent). The GS-Rot method has been implemented online and applied to a case in a work environment characterized by the presence of a high repetition of movements, which is a significant risk factor associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). A total of 17 workstations and 17 workers were involved in the rotation, four of them with physical/psychological limitations. Feasible job rotation schedules were obtained in a short time (average time 27.4 milliseconds). The results indicate that in the rotations driven by preference priorities, almost all the workers (94.11%) were assigned to one of their top five preferences. Likewise, 48.52% of job positions were assigned to workers in their top five of their competence lists. When jobs were assigned according to competence, 58.82% of workers got an assignment among their top five competence lists. Furthermore, 55.87% of the workers achieved jobs in their top five preferences. In both rotation scenarios, the workers varied performed jobs, and fatigue accumulation was balanced among them. The GS-Rot method achieved feasible and uniform solutions regarding the workers' exposure to job repetitiveness.	es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship	This research was funded by the Erasmus+ program of the European Commission under Grant 2017-1-ES01-KA203-038589 in the frame of the project CoSki21-Core Skills for 21th-century professionals.	es_ES
dc.language	Inglés	es_ES
dc.publisher	MDPI AG	es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof	International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health	es_ES
dc.rights	Reconocimiento (by)	es_ES
dc.subject	Job rotation	es_ES
dc.subject	Preferences	es_ES
dc.subject	Competencies	es_ES
dc.subject	Ergonomics	es_ES
dc.subject	Gale-Shapley method	es_ES
dc.subject	Game-theory	es_ES
dc.subject	Musculoskeletal disorders	es_ES
dc.subject.classification	MATEMATICA APLICADA	es_ES
dc.subject.classification	CIENCIAS DE LA COMPUTACION E INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL	es_ES
dc.subject.classification	ARQUITECTURA Y TECNOLOGIA DE COMPUTADORES	es_ES
dc.subject.classification	PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA	es_ES
dc.title	A Game-Theory method to design job rotation schedules to prevent musculoskeletal disorders Based on workers preferences and competencies	es_ES
dc.type	Artículo	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.3390/ijerph16234666	es_ES
dc.relation.projectID	info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/Erasmus+/2017-1-ES01-KA203-038589/EU/Core Skills for 21st Century Professionals/	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	Abierto	es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation	Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Informática de Sistemas y Computadores - Departament d'Informàtica de Sistemes i Computadors	es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation	Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada	es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation	Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria	es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation	Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Matemática Aplicada - Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada	es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation	Asensio-Cuesta, S.; Garcia-Gomez, JM.; Poza-Lujan, J.; Conejero, JA. (2019). A Game-Theory method to design job rotation schedules to prevent musculoskeletal disorders Based on workers preferences and competencies. International Journal of Environmental research and Public Health. 16(23):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234666	es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod	S	es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234666	es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio	1	es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin	16	es_ES
dc.type.version	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion	es_ES
dc.description.volume	16	es_ES
dc.description.issue	23	es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid	31771124	es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid	PMC6926966	es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela	S\397852	es_ES
dc.contributor.funder	European Commission	es_ES
dc.description.references	Aptel, M., Cail, F., Gerling, A., & Louis, O. (2008). Proposal of parameters to implement a workstation rotation system to protect against MSDs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11-12), 900-909. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.006	es_ES
dc.description.references	Jeon, I. S., Jeong, B. Y., & Jeong, J. H. (2016). Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers’ age. Ergonomics, 59(10), 1318-1326. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816	es_ES
dc.description.references	Botti, L., Mora, C., & Calzavara, M. (2017). Design of job rotation schedules managing the exposure to age-related risk factors. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 13993-13997. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2420	es_ES
dc.description.references	Sixth European Working Conditions Survey-6th EWCS-Spainhttps://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-working-conditions-surveys/sixth-european-working-conditions-survey-2015/ewcs-2015-methodology	es_ES
dc.description.references	Asensio-Cuesta, S., Diego-Mas, J. A., Canós-Darós, L., & Andrés-Romano, C. (2011). A genetic algorithm for the design of job rotation schedules considering ergonomic and competence criteria. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(9-12), 1161-1174. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3672-0	es_ES
dc.description.references	Yoon, S.-Y., Ko, J., & Jung, M.-C. (2016). A model for developing job rotation schedules that eliminate sequential high workloads and minimize between-worker variability in cumulative daily workloads: Application to automotive assembly lines. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 8-15. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.01.011	es_ES
dc.description.references	Otto, A., & Scholl, A. (2012). Reducing ergonomic risks by job rotation scheduling. OR Spectrum, 35(3), 711-733. doi:10.1007/s00291-012-0291-6	es_ES
dc.description.references	Carnahan, B. J., Redfern, M. S., & Norman, B. (2000). Designing safe job rotation schedules using optimization and heuristic search. Ergonomics, 43(4), 543-560. doi:10.1080/001401300184404	es_ES
dc.description.references	Song, J., Lee, C., Lee, W., Bahn, S., Jung, C., & Yun, M. H. (2016). Development of a job rotation scheduling algorithm for minimizing accumulated work load per body parts. Work, 53(3), 511-521. doi:10.3233/wor-152232	es_ES
dc.description.references	Boenzi, F., Digiesi, S., Facchini, F., & Mummolo, G. (2016). Ergonomic improvement through job rotations in repetitive manual tasks in case of limited specialization and differentiated ergonomic requirements. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 1667-1672. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.820	es_ES
dc.description.references	Sana, S. S., Ospina-Mateus, H., Arrieta, F. G., & Chedid, J. A. (2018). Application of genetic algorithm to job scheduling under ergonomic constraints in manufacturing industry. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(5), 2063-2090. doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0814-3	es_ES
dc.description.references	Burgess-Limerick, R. (2018). Participatory ergonomics: Evidence and implementation lessons. Applied Ergonomics, 68, 289-293. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.009	es_ES
dc.description.references	Bhuiyan, B. A. (2018). An Overview of Game Theory and Some Applications. Philosophy and Progress, 111-128. doi:10.3329/pp.v59i1-2.36683	es_ES
dc.description.references	Gale, D., & Shapley, L. S. (1962). College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1), 9-15. doi:10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827	es_ES
dc.description.references	Roth, A. E. (2008). What Have We Learned from Market Design? The Economic Journal, 118(527), 285-310. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02121.x	es_ES
dc.description.references	Roth, A. E., & Sotomayor, M. (1992). Chapter 16 Two-sided matching. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, 485-541. doi:10.1016/s1574-0005(05)80019-0	es_ES
dc.description.references	Renna, P. (2017). Decision-making method of reconfigurable manufacturing systems’ reconfiguration by a Gale-Shapley model. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 45, 149-158. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.09.005	es_ES
dc.description.references	Butkovič, P., & Lewis, S. (2007). On the job rotation problem. Discrete Optimization, 4(2), 163-174. doi:10.1016/j.disopt.2006.11.003	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.006	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2420	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1007/s00170-011-3672-0	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.apergo.2016.01.011	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.018	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1007/s00291-012-0291-6	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1080/001401300184404	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1080/00207543.2011.653452	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.3233/WOR-152232	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.820	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1007/s12652-018-0814-3	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.apergo.2017.12.009	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.3329/pp.v59i1-2.36683	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.2478/AMNS.2018.2.00046	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02121.x	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/S1574-0005(05)80019-0	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1007/s00170-013-5155-y	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.09.005	es_ES
dc.relation.references	10.1016/j.disopt.2006.11.003	es_ES
dc.subject.ods	08.- Fomentar el crecimiento económico sostenido, inclusivo y sostenible, el empleo pleno y productivo, y el trabajo decente para todos	es_ES
dc.subject.ods	03.- Garantizar una vida saludable y promover el bienestar para todos y todas en todas las edades	es_ES



Ficheros en el ítem

Descargar (2.618Mb)

Asensio-Cuesta;...o....pdf

PDF

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

• Artículos, conferencias, monografías [48300]
  

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem