Judgmental evaluation of the CEFR by stakeholders in language testing
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.contributor.author | Simons, Mathea
|
es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Colpaert, Jozef
|
es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-22T13:14:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-22T13:14:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-07-02 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1886-2438 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/53601 | |
| dc.description.abstract | [EN] This study provides insights into the judgmental evaluation of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) by stakeholders or users. Given its widespread use and the debates surrounding it, a deeper analysis was required regarding their experiences when applying the CEFR in their daily practice of language testing, their perceptions on possible improvements and priorities. One hundred eighty-eight users, representing several groups of stakeholders, attended a conference on the topic and participated in discussion groups. These discussion groups were nourished by data obtained by a pre-conference survey and followed by a voting process on priorities for improving the Framework. The results show that the respondents have a positive attitude towards the CEFR. They use it for several purposes and consider its usefulness, authenticity and applicability as positive aspects. The degree of detail and practicality are assessed less positively. The most important recommendation for improvement lies in further fine-tuning and in improving practice and implementation. | es_ES |
| dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas | |
| dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
| dc.subject | CEFR | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Language testing | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Usefulness | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Improvements | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Prioritization | es_ES |
| dc.title | Judgmental evaluation of the CEFR by stakeholders in language testing | es_ES |
| dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
| dc.date.updated | 2015-07-22T11:56:31Z | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/rlyla.2015.3434 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
| dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Simons, M.; Colpaert, J. (2015). Judgmental evaluation of the CEFR by stakeholders in language testing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 10:66-77. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2015.3434 | es_ES |
| dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2015.3434 | es_ES |
| dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 66 | es_ES |
| dc.description.upvformatpfin | 77 | es_ES |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
| dc.description.volume | 10 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1886-6298 | |
| dc.description.references | Alderson, J.C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Kaftandjieva, F. (2007). "Quantifying the quality of linkage between language examinations and the CEFR", in C. Carlsen and E. Moe (eds.) A human touch to language testing. Oslo: Novus Press, 33-43. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Keddle, J.S. (2004). "Insights from the Common European Framework, 2004", The CES and secondary school syllabus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43-54. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Picardo, E. (2011). "Du CECR au développement professionnel : pour une démarche stratégique", Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 14/2, 20-52. | es_ES |
| dc.description.references | Urkun, Z. (2008). "Re-evaluating the CEFR: an attempt", In The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFRL): Benefits and Limitations. IATEFL TEA SIG Croatia Conference Proceedings, pp. 10-14, Canterbury. | es_ES |
| dc.relation.references | 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_4.x | es_ES |
| dc.relation.references | 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_5.x | es_ES |
| dc.relation.references | 10.1177/0265532209349472 | es_ES |
| dc.relation.references | 10.1080/15434300802606440 | es_ES |
| dc.relation.references | 10.1191/0265532205lt309oa | es_ES |
Ficheros en el ítem
